thebowerbirds:

Source: Living Etc
I’m back in the UK after a quick trip home and whilst catching up on some reading I stumbled across this little gem. I love this idea of using an old piece in a way that it wasn’t intended for - I’m referring to the cabinet unit obviously, which fits perfectly into this eclectic & collected bathroom.

thebowerbirds:

Source: Living Etc

I’m back in the UK after a quick trip home and whilst catching up on some reading I stumbled across this little gem. I love this idea of using an old piece in a way that it wasn’t intended for - I’m referring to the cabinet unit obviously, which fits perfectly into this eclectic & collected bathroom.

(via jeanfivintage)

dieriv:

T. A. R. D. I. S.  (Time And Relative Dimension In Space)

(via anglophilium)

antropoloog:

"I would define politics as the composition of a common world"
Click Bruno Latour’s beautiful face for an interview with this French social anthropologist on politics, ethics, nature, and so on.

antropoloog:

"I would define politics as the composition of a common world"

Click Bruno Latour’s beautiful face for an interview with this French social anthropologist on politics, ethics, nature, and so on.

depredando:

GAIA IN THE ANTHROPOCENE By Bruno Latour
“Geologists are beginning to use the term ANTHROPOCENE to designate the era of Earth’s history that extends from the scientific and industrial revolutions to the present day. These geologists see humanity as a force of the same amplitude as volcanoes or even plate tectonics. It is now before GAIA that we are summoned to appear: Gaia, the odd, doubly composite figure made up of science and mythology, used by certain specialists to designate the Earth that surrounds us and that we surround, the truly global Globe that threatens us even as we threaten it.
If I wanted to dramatize – perhaps overdramatize – the ambiance of my investigative project, I would say that it seeks to register the aftershocks of the MODERNIZATION FRONT just as the confrontation with Gaia appears imminent.
At all events, we shall not cure the Moderns of their attachment to their cherished theme, the modernization front, if we do not offer them an alternate narrative… After all, the Moderns have cities who are often quite beautiful; they are city-dwellers, citizens, they call themselves (and are sometimes called) “civilized”.
Why would we not have the right to propose to them a form of habitation that is more comfortable and convenient and that takes into account both their past and their future – a more sustainable habitat, in a way? Why would they not be at ease there? Why would they wander in the permanent utopia that has for so long made them beings without hearth or home – and has driven them for that very reason to inflict fire and bloodshed on the planet?
After all these years of wandering in the desert, do they have hope of reaching not the Promised Land but Earth itself, quite simply, the only one they have, at once underfoot and all around them, the aptly named Gaia?”
BRUNO LATOUR.“An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns”Download e-book at Library Genesis.Join: http://www.modesofexistence.orgSHARE

depredando:

GAIA IN THE ANTHROPOCENE 
By Bruno Latour

“Geologists are beginning to use the term ANTHROPOCENE to designate the era of Earth’s history that extends from the scientific and industrial revolutions to the present day. These geologists see humanity as a force of the same amplitude as volcanoes or even plate tectonics. It is now before GAIA that we are summoned to appear: Gaia, the odd, doubly composite figure made up of science and mythology, used by certain specialists to designate the Earth that surrounds us and that we surround, the truly global Globe that threatens us even as we threaten it.

If I wanted to dramatize – perhaps overdramatize – the ambiance of my investigative project, I would say that it seeks to register the aftershocks of the MODERNIZATION FRONT just as the confrontation with Gaia appears imminent.

At all events, we shall not cure the Moderns of their attachment to their cherished theme, the modernization front, if we do not offer them an alternate narrative… After all, the Moderns have cities who are often quite beautiful; they are city-dwellers, citizens, they call themselves (and are sometimes called) “civilized”.

Why would we not have the right to propose to them a form of habitation that is more comfortable and convenient and that takes into account both their past and their future – a more sustainable habitat, in a way? Why would they not be at ease there? Why would they wander in the permanent utopia that has for so long made them beings without hearth or home – and has driven them for that very reason to inflict fire and bloodshed on the planet?

After all these years of wandering in the desert, do they have hope of reaching not the Promised Land but Earth itself, quite simply, the only one they have, at once underfoot and all around them, the aptly named Gaia?”

BRUNO LATOUR.
“An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns”
Download e-book at Library Genesis.
Join: http://www.modesofexistence.org
SHARE